翻訳と辞書 |
O'Brien v MGN Ltd : ウィキペディア英語版 | O'Brien v MGN Ltd
''O’Brien v MGN Ltd'' () (EWCA Civ 1279 ) is an English contract law case, concerning incorporation of terms through reasonable notice. ==Facts== The defendant put scratchcards with its newspapers-- ''Daily Mirror'', ''Sunday Mirror'' and ''The People''. If the card came up with money, players called a premium rate number to see if the amount matched a mystery bonus cash amount. Mr O’Brien on 3 July 1995 got two sums of £50,000. 1471 other people did as well, because MGN had distributed too many by mistake. MGN had only intended to have one prize of £50,000. MGN held a draw among the 1472. MGN pointed to "Rule 5", which said there would be a draw where more prizes were claimed than available. Rule 5, however, although published in some newspapers, was not to be found in the 3 July 1995 edition. This only said ‘Normal Mirror Group rules apply.’ Mr O’Brien had seen that. The question was whether Rule 5 was incorporated into the scratchcard agreement.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「O'Brien v MGN Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|