翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ O'Donoghue's Opera
・ O'Donoghue's Pub
・ O'Donohue
・ O'Donohue v Canada
・ O'Donovan family
・ O'Donovan Rossa (Skibbereen) GAA
・ O'Donovan Rossa Bridge
・ O'Donovan Rossa GAA
・ O'Donovan Rossa GAC Belfast
・ O'Dowd
・ O'Dowd Cove
・ O'Brien Township, Beltrami County, Minnesota
・ O'Brien Trophy
・ O'Brien Trophy (disambiguation)
・ O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police
O'Brien v MGN Ltd
・ O'Brien's Bridge
・ O'Brien's Road
・ O'Brien's Tower
・ O'Brien, Argentina
・ O'Brien, California
・ O'Brien, Florida
・ O'Brien, Oregon
・ O'Brien, Texas
・ O'Brien, Washington
・ O'Brien, West Virginia
・ O'Brien-class destroyer
・ O'Brien-Peuschel Farmstead
・ O'Briens Creek
・ O'Briens Irish Sandwich Bars


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

O'Brien v MGN Ltd : ウィキペディア英語版
O'Brien v MGN Ltd

''O’Brien v MGN Ltd'' () (EWCA Civ 1279 ) is an English contract law case, concerning incorporation of terms through reasonable notice.
==Facts==
The defendant put scratchcards with its newspapers-- ''Daily Mirror'', ''Sunday Mirror'' and ''The People''. If the card came up with money, players called a premium rate number to see if the amount matched a mystery bonus cash amount. Mr O’Brien on 3 July 1995 got two sums of £50,000. 1471 other people did as well, because MGN had distributed too many by mistake. MGN had only intended to have one prize of £50,000. MGN held a draw among the 1472. MGN pointed to "Rule 5", which said there would be a draw where more prizes were claimed than available. Rule 5, however, although published in some newspapers, was not to be found in the 3 July 1995 edition. This only said ‘Normal Mirror Group rules apply.’ Mr O’Brien had seen that. The question was whether Rule 5 was incorporated into the scratchcard agreement.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「O'Brien v MGN Ltd」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.